Which of the following might constitute intentional tort?

The option that involves deliberately causing harm to another clearly aligns with the definition of an intentional tort. In legal terms, an intentional tort occurs when a person willfully engages in actions that result in harm or injury to another individual. This means that the perpetrator has the intent to bring about some sort of contact or harm, which differentiates it from other torts that are based on negligence or accidents.

In contrast, the other options pertain to situations where there is no deliberate intent to harm. For example, negligently causing an injury involves a failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm, which classifies it as a negligent tort. Similarly, accidentally damaging someone's property lacks any intention to cause that damage, positioning it outside the realm of intentional torts. Ignoring a person's rights, while serious, does not inherently mean that there is a clear intention to cause harm or injury, and often falls under more general civil rights or negligence issues.

Thus, the defining characteristic of an intentional tort is the intent to bring about harmful consequences, making the option that states deliberately causing harm to another the correct answer.