Which of the following is NOT a component of reasonable suspicion?

Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard used in law enforcement to justify brief stops and investigations of potential criminal behavior. It involves a combination of specific and articulable facts that, when taken together, lead an officer to believe that a crime is either occurring or is about to occur.

The correct response highlights that the need for evidence of a completed crime is not a component of reasonable suspicion. Instead, reasonable suspicion is based on the officer's observations, experiences, and the particular context of the situation. This means that an officer can take action based on a belief that a crime might happen, even if a crime has not yet occurred, which deviates from the requirement of having conclusive evidence of a completed crime.

On the other hand, intuitive feelings, the ability to articulate specific facts, and a general suspicion that a crime may occur are all recognized components of reasonable suspicion. These factors allow officers to initiate investigations in situations that raise alarms without needing to have witnessed a crime being committed. Such nuances ensure that law enforcement can respond to potential threats while balancing individual rights.