Which of the following is NOT an element needed to prove trespassing on property?

The option that indicates the defendant had permission to enter the property is not an element needed to prove trespassing. In fact, permission to enter completely negates the ability to claim trespass, as trespassing involves entering or remaining on someone else's property without authorization.

Trespass law requires several key components for a successful claim. First, the property must be owned by someone who is authorized to control access to it; this is why the ownership element is essential. Secondly, the act of entering or remaining on the property must be willful, meaning the individual intended to be on that property without permission. This aspect confirms the defendant's conscious choice, distinguishing it from an accidental entry. Lastly, adequate notice must have been provided against unauthorized entry, as this serves to inform potential trespassers that they do not have permission to be on the property.

Thus, the fact that a defendant had permission to enter the property cannot form any part of a trespassing claim, making this the element that does not belong among the required elements needed to establish a case of trespass.