Which of the following is NOT an element of negligence?

In the context of negligence, an individual can be found liable if four elements are proven: a duty to act with care, a breach of that duty, causation, and damages. Among these, the presence of intent to cause harm is notably absent. Negligence focuses on the failure to exercise reasonable care, which means that the action or inaction was not intentional or willful. Instead, it revolves around the concept of carelessness or recklessness leading to unintentional harm.

The duty to act with care refers to the responsibility one has to avoid actions that could foreseeably harm others. Breach of that duty indicates that a person failed to uphold that standard of care. Damages are necessary to establish that the plaintiff suffered actual harm as a result of that breach. However, the concept of intent is more closely associated with intentional torts, which involve conscious decisions to cause harm, distinguishing them from negligence's focus on carelessness rather than intent. Thus, intent to cause harm is not a requisite element in a negligence claim, which confirms the accuracy of the conclusion drawn from the question.