Which of the following can lead to the justification of the use of deadly force against a fleeing felon?

The justification for the use of deadly force against a fleeing felon primarily hinges on the nature of the crime committed. When a suspect has committed a serious crime that involves physical harm, the use of deadly force may be deemed necessary to protect the community or prevent the suspect from causing further harm during their escape. Laws and guidelines regarding the use of force, especially deadly force, often prioritize maintaining public safety and ensuring that violent offenders do not evade apprehension, especially when their actions pose an ongoing threat to others.

In situations where the crime committed is of a serious nature, such as violent felonies, law enforcement officials are often trained to assess the threat level posed by the suspect. This can include considerations of whether the suspect poses a danger to officers or the public as they attempt to escape. Consequently, serious crimes that include elements of physical harm may warrant a response that allows for the use of deadly force under specific circumstances.

Factors like verbal threats, fleeing from minor offenses, or cooperating with law enforcement do not meet the legal threshold for justifying deadly force. In these scenarios, the perceived threat to life is significantly lower, and law enforcement is expected to employ less lethal means of apprehension.